"Many choose to alter, modify or abandon religion, since it is difficult
to advocate something which condemns our existence." - Mary Ann Sorrentino,
"My Church Threw Me Out"
There is a vastness of oppression that traditional Western religions
(Christianity, Judaism and Muslim) bestow upon women. I was raised in
a United Methodist family, but, at an early age, realized the contradictions,
the lack of a female presence, and the general air of misogyny throughout
the Bible and church services. Confirmation classes were enough to confirm
my belief that the Protestant religion was nothing of value to me, and
would not affirm my life but scar it. Despite familial resistance-like
my mother calling me a Satan worshipper merely because I no longer was
a ChristianóI refused to associate with Christianity at the age of 14.
I was nevertheless thirsty for "soul food" and searched everywhere for
an appropriate belief system where I could worship with others who felt
the same. I sought out others who believed that the earth was sacred,
womanhood was sacred, and the female way of knowing and experiencing
was sacred. I ventured into traditional Native American beliefs, Eastern
"religions", such as Jainism, Zoastroism, Buddhism, Taoism, Spiritualism,
Theosophy and Wicca.
The atrocities that the Catholic religion continues to heap on its
women practitioners today are obvious and ridiculous. I feel for Mary
Ann Sorrentino, who was excommunicated by the Catholic Church for her
job as executive director of a Planned Parenthood office. But why are
all these women trying to vie for power in a structure that is so inherently
male, that has so much history of oppression of all peoples, that continues
to oppress? Why would they want to be remotely associated with the Catholic
Church? One can answer: tradition. So, it is in their tradition that
men are able to rise up in a hierarchy while women cannot, that men
can take certain sacraments that women can't. That, a few hundred years
ago, men sat around a table discussing whether women had souls or not!
The roots of misogyny and dualistic thought in Christianity pre-dates
to the Hebrew language. Unlike the English language, there is no neuter
pronoun. In other words, the English language has an "it"; the Hebrew
language does not. The Hebrew language can only address things as "he"
or "she" - therefore, the Hebrews could only address the concept of
God as "he" or "she." There are a few texts, found in the last 50 years
in the Dead Sea Scrolls (see Elaine Pagels and the new Apocrypha) wherein
God was female or addressed herself as "she." But those documents were
lost, burned, destroyed or hidden deep in the caverns of the Vatican.
That was heretical stuff. Heretical, only, because if people had been
armed with that knowledge, men would no longer be able to wield religion
as a stick. Likewise, Rosemary Ruether believed "the oppression of women
stemmed from the dualistic thinking - placing, for example, the soul
in opposition to the body, and spirit in opposition to nature - that
has come to be a central aspect of Christian thought. This dualismÖresulted
in a hierarchical structure wherein men are placed above nature and
believe that it is their right to dominate it." May I add men in opposition
to women? The unwritten rule that men are good and innocent - like Adam
- and women are evil and conniving - like Eve? Binary thinking? It is
little wonder so many men are computer programmers, and how Christianity
upholds traditional male thinking and paradigms.
I agree with Mary Daly, the feminist writer, who, "Öleft Christianity
behind, positing that it was beyond hope of feminist reform. Unlike
feminist theologians who work to separate what they see as Christianityís
original, egalitarian message from subsequent patriarchal interpretations,
Daly felt that such a task was impossible and unnecessary; to be a truly
radical feminist, she asserted, one must part with Christianity altogether."
The structure and very foundation of traditional Western religions
subvert the feminine and reinforce masculine ways and beliefs. What
could a woman possibly gain from participation in it? It is like these
Western religions are commercial farmsóthere is no vitality, no nutrients
left in the soil, yet farmers are still trying to draw something wholesome.
Throw out the whole batch and begin anew, where roots havenít festered
or grown dry and brittle, where half of the population still normalizes
their own oppression.
04.2000
© 1990 - 2003 Katharina Woodworth