"The psychology of oppressed peoples is not silly. Jews, immigrants,
black men and all women have employed the same psychological mechanisms
to survive: admiring the oppressor, wanting the oppressor to like
them, mostly because the oppressor held all the power." - Pat Mainardi,
"The Politics of Housework"
I have seen the correlation many times between oppressed people -
and creatures - but didn't think of the psychology that developed
from similar experience. My mother is adamant that God is a man -
and when she was a child, she wanted to be a man, too. She was envious
of the obvious power and freedom delegated to boys, resentful of her
lack of options, society's limitations. She did nothing to circumvent
her restrictions - she chided, hated and competed with other women
- secretly hated, but always admired, men.
I grew up with her telling me that "women were boring," that it was
men who made strides in science, literature, art. (Of course, she
concluded that the reason why was because there was something innately
inferior about women, not that women had no support and were forced
to be the backbone to male egos for centuries.) Her reasoning was:
what have women done? "They just want to stay at home and raise kids...",
my mother often poked fun at what she named "girly-girls" - she didn't
like the feminine exhibited in anyone, yet she did not compete with
men on their turf. Although she was accepted at difficult, academic
schools (she came-of-age in educationally-tracked West Germany), she
chose to graduate from a vo-tech school. She didn't head corporations,
make managerial decisions, or become a professional. She rose to the
ranks of a barely-paid bi-lingual secretary. Instead of hating men
or the patriarchy, venting her rage where it should have been vented,
she pointed the finger at herself and every other caged woman. She
became married, raised three children, and resented the endless array
of household upkeep that weighed down her shoulders. She resented
her children for just being there, because they caused all that work.
She resented her husband, who never helped around the house and took
years to view her own business ventures seriously. She was like the
oppressed John Stuart Mill spoke about in his On the Subjection of
Women:
In all the anger my mother expressed, all her rage never went anywhere,
never changed anything, though it could have fueled several revolutions.
She accepted the patriarchal paradigm and turned her rage onto herself.
05.2000
© 1990 - 2003 Katharina Woodworth